Original Article
Production and Marketing Analysis of Knol-khol under Sub-Tropical Conditions of Jammu Region: A case study
Year: 2018 | Month: September | Volume 63 | Issue 3
1.Banker, R.D., Charnes, A. and Cooper, W.W. 1984. Models for estimation of technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30: 1078–1092.
View at Google Scholar2.Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W. and Rhodes, E. 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6): 429–444
View at Google Scholar3.Coelli, T.J., Rao, D.S.P., O’Donnell, C.J. and Battese, G.E. 1998. An Introduction to Productivity and Efficiency Analysis, 2nd ed. Springer Science, New York
View at Google Scholar4.Debreu, G. 1951. The coefficient of resource utilization. Econometrica, 19(3): 273–292
View at Google Scholar5.Fare, R. and Lovell, C.A.K. 1978. Measuring technical efficiency in production. Journal of Economic Theory, 19(1): 150–162
View at Google Scholar6.Farrell, M.J. 1957. The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 120(3): 253–290.
View at Google Scholar7.Kachroo, J., Bhat, Anil and Kachroo, D. 2012. Economic Evaluation of Production and Marketing of Orange in Jammu region of Jammu and Kashmir state. Indian Journal of Agricultural Marketing, 26(1): 150-167.
View at Google Scholar8.NHB, 2011. National Horticultural Board, (web site: www. nhb.gov.in), New Delhi
View at Google Scholar9.Ramunathan, R. 2003. An Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis: A Tool for Performance Measurement. Sage Publication, New Delhi.
View at Google Scholar10.Sharma, S.K. and Raina, D. 2013. Performance analysis of Indian automobile sector using non-parametric approach. International Journal of Business Excellence, 6(5): 505-525.
View at Google Scholar11.Sreenivasa Murthy, D., Sudha, M., Hegde, M.R. and Dakshinamoorthy, V. 2009. Technical Efficiency and its Determinants in Tomato Production in Karnataka, India: Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) Approach. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 22: 215-224
View at Google Scholar